Life Style

War in Ukraine: “Vladimir Putin resorts to paranoid-style speech”

The cross : When you observe the conflict in Ukraine, what strikes you about the climate of communication war that is unfolding?

David Colon : We all realize, I believe, that we are in a global information war and that no one can now escape it. For several years, we have entered an era of total propaganda due to the existence of social networks, the Internet, the interconnection of individuals and the development of propaganda and mass manipulation techniques. We are currently seeing the materialization of this evolution which has rendered national borders extremely porous and offered an opportunity for propagandists to act on behavior on a large scale.

→ READ. War in Ukraine, 13th day: update on the situation

How did Putin’s Russia seize this new opportunity?

CD: If we seek to understand Russia’s point of view on propaganda, we must begin by recalling that Russia has a long tradition of propaganda. It dates back to the Russian Revolution of 1917 with the birth of agit-prop, “agitational propaganda”. Russia coined the word “disinformation” in 1949. During the Cold War, the KGB developed ever more sophisticated propaganda strategies and tactics aimed at Western populations.

→ ANALYSIS. Ukrainian crisis: the information battle rages on

Since 2012, in response to the democratic movements that have developed on its periphery, Russia has launched a veritable information war that has resulted in all the forms of propaganda that we know. It used “white propaganda”, that is, official propaganda – through RT, Sputnik and others – which carries Russia’s voice to the world, but it also used “black propaganda”. “, the hidden propaganda, which is based on actions under false flags (expression coming from the American expression “False flag”, which consists in pretending to be what one is not, Editor’s note)which most often aims to destabilize democracies, starting with the United States.

These propaganda operations were very widely carried out on the Internet, in particular through the use of social network advertising services. The objective as much as the effect has been to amplify all the pre-existing tensions and divisions in Western societies: support for the Catalan and Brexit referendums, support for social or ethnic conflicts in developed countries to weaken them, massive dissemination of theories conspiracy encouraging mistrust and doubt and interference in political life to make objective allies triumph, like Donald Trump in the United States.

Since 2012, digital propaganda has been incorporated into Russian military doctrine by the current Chief of Staff of the Russian Armies, General Gerasimov, who theorized hybrid warfare, i.e. the coordination of affairs military, intelligence and propaganda. It is based on a simple idea that in the digital age, information has become a weapon of the same type as lethal and ballistic weapons.

How does Russian propaganda work today?

CD: It is based on the doctrine of control of the information sphere. This notion of “informational sphere” covers three realities: the material elements of information distribution (cables etc.), the software elements and the very content of the information. We are seeing the implementation of this doctrine on a very large scale. Its scheme is simple: for Russia, it is a question of protecting its informational sphere from any interference from the enemy and, conversely, of disrupting the informational sphere of the enemy to reduce its ability to take rational decisions which would be harmful. for her.

→ ANALYSIS. ‘No one knows what we are allowed to publish’: Russia criminalizes press work

For years now, we have been witnessing in Russia the takeover of the media and an effort to control social networks. For two years, Russia has been preparing what it is now trying to implement: the attempt to shut down the Internet within its borders to establish an information wall comparable to that which China has established since the end of of the 1990s.

One uses speaks of the “lead screed” that Putin poses on his country with the new law on information. Can such a screed really exist in the digital age?

CD: Putin has been striving since the beginning of his rule to control information, but you are right, it is extremely difficult to completely control information in the digital age. Moreover, such tight control can produce unexpected effects: from the moment there are no more Western media, nor opposition media in Russia, it is no longer possible for the Russian authorities to make prevail the idea of ​​pluralistic information. So that we could witness the awareness of a growing part of Russian public opinion of the propagandist nature of the information at its disposal.

How can we characterize the discourse of Russian propaganda today?

CD: I am struck by the use of paranoid-style speech. Putin’s propaganda is aimed at Russians by emphasizing everything that distinguishes them from the rest of the world and by exacerbating the idea that the West in general, and NATO countries in particular, represent a threat to Russia. Russian identity or security, and a disinformation enterprise. This is what is called meta propaganda: everything that comes from the enemy is presented as propaganda. So far this has been relatively effective and has allowed Putin to inoculate Russian public opinion against information coming from the West.

What is Putin’s goal in terms of propaganda?

CD: Its first objective vis-à-vis Ukraine is psychological warfare. It was about winning a victory without fighting. I believe Putin was persuaded that the war in Ukraine could be won quickly, with virtually no fighting. All his war speech rested on this strategy. Some military analysts have noted that the massive use of airborne troops in the early days of the offensive was more a matter of psychological warfare strategy than military rationality.

→ READ. In Russia, the systematic use of war propaganda

How can Putin’s propaganda be defeated?

CD: If Putin’s speech did not work, it is because the American strategy very early consisted in revealing the intentions of the Russians and their strategy, including propaganda. It made it possible to protect Western populations in advance against Russian arguments. When it comes to propaganda, counter-speech and counter-propaganda are ineffective because they often have the effect of reinforcing pre-existing opinions. What is effective is disclosure.

What can democracies do to fortify themselves against the exponential reality of propaganda?

CD: The European Union should soon adopt a general regulation on artificial intelligence which provides for the prohibition of a certain number of mass manipulation tools, which in particular use the predictive analysis of the personality of users. This proposal is a step in the right direction.

→ ANALYSIS. Struggling on the ground, Ukraine dominates information warfare

In France, as in other Western democracies, it seems to me that the best thing to do is to strengthen the independent press, and to strengthen the independence of the press. It is a question of defending the major media and journalists, who have been weakened by the rise of the Internet, because a quality professional press is the best bulwark of our democracies.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *